RUBRIC: DISCUSSION BOARD (30 pts)
Last updated: 02/02/2017 © 2017 School of Nursing – Ohio University Page 1 of 1
NOTE: No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.
*Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc. – see library tab on how to access these from
database searches), professional organizations (NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs – National
Guideline Clearinghouse). All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information) References not acceptable (not inclusive)
are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.
**Since it is difficult to edit the APA reference in the Blackboard discussion area, you can copy and paste APA references from your Word document to the Blackboard discussion area
and points will not be deducted because of format changes in spacing.
Levels of Achievement
Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory
of initial post
10 to 10 Points
Provided response with rationale.
The post is substantive and reflects careful
consideration of the literature.
Examples from the student’s practice/experience are
provided to illustrate the discussion concepts.
Addressed all required elements of the discussion
Well organized and easy to read.
3 to 9 Points
Provided response missing either
substantive rationale, consideration of the
literature, or examples from the student’s
practice/experience to illustrate the
Addresses all or most of required elements.
Somewhat organized, but may be difficult to
0 to 2 Points
Provided response with minimal
Does not demonstrate thought
and provides no supporting
details or examples.
Provides a general summary of
5 to 5 Points
Cited minimum of two references: at least one (1)
from required course materials to support rationale
AND one (1) from peer-reviewed* references from
supplemental materials or independent study on the
topic to support responses.
The initial post is a minimum of 200 words excluding
2 to 4 Points
Missing one (1) required course reference
AND/OR one (1) peer-reviewed reference to
Post has at least 200 words.
0 to 1 Points
Missing 1 or more of the correct
type (course or peer-reviewed)
or number of references to
Post is less than 200 words or
there’s no post.
10 to 10 Points
Responses to colleagues demonstrated insight and
critical review of the colleagues’ posts and stimulate
Responded to a minimum of two (2) peers and
included a minimum of one (1) peer-reviewed* or
course materials reference per response.
Responses are a minimum of 100 words and are
posted on different days of the discussion period by
the due date.
4 to 9 Points
Responses to colleagues are cursory, do not
stimulate further discussion and paragraph
could have been more substantial.
Responses missing one of the following:
o insight/critical review of colleague’s
o OR respond to at least two peers,
o OR a peer reviewed*or course materials
reference per response
Responses are a minimum or less than
100 words and posts were on the same
date as initial post.
0 to 3 Points
Responses to colleagues lack
critical, in depth thought and
do not add value to the
Responses are missing two or
more of the following:
o insight/critical review of
o AND/OR response to at least
o AND/OR a peer reviewed*
reference per response.
Responses are less than 100
words, posted same day as
5 to 5 Points
APA format** is