Write a response tothe following prompt:
Provide a general description of COPPS, and describe how itdiffers in philosophy and practice from traditional, reactive policing.
What are the four steps in the S.A.R.A problem solving process,and how can it be used to help stop crime? Give a specific example of a crime,and its situation, that could benefit from this method.
Heather wrote, COPPS- according toour text on page 82 is “represents a dramatic shift from the traditionalmethods of policing” (Peaks, Gains & Glensor, 2012). What this meansis that it is a proactive philosophy and is used for problem solving forcriminal activity in the neighborhoods. Which means that with criminalactivity sends fear, and affects the quality of life. This is where thecommunity and police departments work together to solve problems that affectstheir neighborhood.
Traditional policingis a reactive approach and is natural. Police would patrol their beatsand would answers calls or give tickets for minor infractions. The policewould also, of course answer crimes that were in progress. To preventcrimes the key would be more police presence in the troubleneighborhoods. With traditional policing the interaction between thepolice and the community was negative.
The SARA steps are:
Scanning- initialinformation gathering stage by the supervisors
Analysis- morein-depth information gathering stage, involving crime reports, the crimeanalysis unit, a news report, and zoning and health departments.
Response-involves anumber of meetings, improved the lighting and landscaping, agreements.
Assessments- Afollow-up look at the CFS (Calls for Service) in the area.
The specific crimethat SARA would work is graffiti, which is vandalism. Here in Ashland we weregetting hit with graffiti by one person for over 9 months. The SARAworked, because we scanned the tags, analysis that the tags were being doneover and over, responded by taking pictures and cleaning it up, the assessmentwould be that we put it in the City Source that comes with the electric billeach month. We did not use the media, because we did not want to glorifythe crime, but had wanted the citizens of Ashland help find him in which they did.
Peak, K., Gaines, L.& Glensor, R. (2010). Police supervision and management in an eraof community policing (3rd ed.) Upper saddle, NJ: Pearson Education,Inc. ISBN: 9780135154663
my response, Heather:You clearly described the generaldescription of Community Oriented Policing Philosophies and also defined thedifferences between Community Oriented Policing Philosophies to the traditionalmethod and reactive methods. COPPS as a dramatic shift from the traditionalmethod of policing where by the police were basically based on one place andalways went to deal with a crime when it arisen. This made a big differencesince any criminal activity was not reported in advance. Therefore put a lot offear to the people of the society leading to a poor quality of their life. According to the article COPPS integrated thecommunity to policing that brought down the anxiety of police and other lawenforcement officers (Stevens, 2009). What do you think about the effects of eachmethod as differences between the two philosophies?
Youclearly stated the four steps of SARA as scanning, analyzing, responding andassessing.
Stevens, D. J. (2009). Anintroduction to American policing. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Williamson, T. (2008). TheHandbook of Knowledge Based Policing: Current Conceptions and Future Directions. Chichester: JohnWiley & Sons. Need to tell the bad and good of post this references our discussion is first then blo i listed the persons response and some of my response. make any changed thanks